Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
House Energy and Commerce hearing splits over proposed 10‑year moratorium on state AI rules
Summary
At a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee hearing, lawmakers and witnesses debated a proposed 10‑year ban on state enforcement of AI laws, weighing concerns that the moratorium would protect startups and interstate commerce against arguments it would strip existing consumer protections and leave children and other vulnerable people exposed.
At a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee hearing on AI regulation and U.S. leadership, lawmakers and outside experts sparred over a provision in recent congressional text that would bar state enforcement of AI-related laws for up to 10 years.
Chairman Gus Bilirakis opened the hearing by framing the technology’s promise and risks, saying, “Since the public release of ChatGPT, AI has become a household name.” He and several witnesses urged a federal framework to provide certainty for innovators while protecting consumers and national competitiveness.
The dispute centered on a moratorium many Republicans have advanced in reconciliation text that would prevent states from enforcing AI-specific rules. Supporters including Sean Heather, senior vice president for international regulatory affairs at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and Adam Thier, a senior fellow at the R Street Institute, argued the moratorium would prevent a costly patchwork of state laws that could lock out small and mid‑sized innovators. Heather warned that heavy state regulation and European-style rules…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

