Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Multifamily Conversion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission denies zoning change for 3000 West Garden Road after commissioners cite "bait‑and‑switch" concerns
Summary
The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously denied a zoning change and concept plan at 3000 West Garden Road after commissioners raised concerns about the property's prior condominium designation and long‑running use as rental multifamily.
The Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously to deny a zoning change and concept plan for 3000 West Garden Road after extensive discussion about the property's history and perceived mismatch between initial approvals and current operation.
Savannah (staff) told the commission the site is currently developed under a planned development that identified the tract for condominium high‑rise use, but the owner has operated the property as rental multifamily since 2020. Staff said the property is functionally multifamily and that the proposed amendment would add "multifamily" as an allowed use and adjust height and density standards (increase maximum height to 75 feet and density to 35 units per acre) to bring the development into conformance.
Attorney David Drum, representing the owner Envision Bridal LLC, said the condominium regime was recorded and that no units have been conveyed; he said the owner has the right to rent units and that the change is requested to enable an imminent sale because a buyer required dissolution of the condominium regime. "The property is currently in compliance by virtue of the fact that condominium regime has been recorded," Drum said, adding that the buyer requires a change to MF‑3 standards to complete the sale.
Commissioners expressed frustration that the development has operated as rentals without enforcement and described the proposal as a "bait‑and‑switch" because the original expectation for condominiums implied individual ownership. Multiple commissioners said approving the zoning change would make it easier for the owner to sell the property as a rental asset at odds with neighborhood expectations. Commissioner Cheryl Smith moved to deny the zoning change and concept plan (Item 6); the motion passed unanimously.
The denial keeps the property in its current zoning configuration and preserves the council’s prior interpretation; any future request must return to the commission.
