Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Improvement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews Mitchell High School innovation plan; state board previously approved the plan 9–0
Summary
Administrators presented Mitchell High School’s innovation and pathway plans to the District 11 board, noting the Colorado State Board of Education approved the plan unanimously and that the district will add external partial academic management and targeted instructional supports.
Get email alerts on the School Improvement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Area administrators presented Mitchell High School’s innovation plan and pathway plan updates, noting the Colorado State Board of Education previously approved the plan unanimously (9–0).
Area Superintendent (identified in the transcript as Callback) said the plan is two-pronged: partial academic management and continuation of the innovation plan. The presentation to the state board was described as receiving strong support. Administrators said they made no changes to the innovation plan’s waivers and that local board acknowledgment would signal support for the plan as approved by the state. The plan’s stated root causes, administrators said, focus on classroom instructional quality, hiring and compensation, and talent development and evaluation practices. Administrators and Mitchell leaders said many teachers are working hard but students were arriving substantially below grade level in reading and math on entry; the district intends to staff more intensive instructional coaching and supports and to use a partner organization (one used successfully at other district schools) to accelerate instructional improvement.
Board members asked for more detailed, local progress monitoring and suggested that benchmark and state monitoring documents (progress reports provided to CDE) be linked in future board materials. Administrators said those progress-monitoring documents are publicly available and offered to include them in the monthly report to the board.
No formal vote was required at this meeting to renew the plan locally; administrators said innovation plans must return to the local board periodically (every three years) for review and that the state’s acceptance marks an important step toward implementing the additional academic supports described in the pathway plan.

