Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Disciplinary Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Auctioneer commission reviews complaints; one $250 penalty for unlicensed online activity, several dismissals
Summary
At its May 19 meeting the Tennessee Auctioneer Commission reviewed multiple complaint files, dismissed several consumer complaints and approved a $250 civil penalty for unlicensed online auction activity; commissioners urged civil remedies in consumer disputes where appropriate.
Get email alerts on the Disciplinary Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Tennessee Auctioneer Commission reviewed multiple complaint files May 19 and voted to dismiss several matters it found outside the commission's jurisdiction or lacking evidence, and voted to assess a civil penalty in one case for unlicensed activity.
Commission legal counsel summarized seven complaint matters. The commission dismissed complaints that allege (1) a buyer failed to pay for a vehicle later determined to have been the buyer's repossessed vehicle; (2) repeated buyer claims of misrepresented item condition where the respondent showed inspection opportunities and auction records; (3) an apparent out-of-state sale and storage dispute where the respondent subsequently paid $169 to the complainant; (4) advertising that included name and license information on a site footer that required scrolling; (5) a dispute over earnest money for a commercial property where the auctioneer interpleaded funds with the court. In each of those matters the commission found insufficient evidence of rule violations and voted to dismiss.
In a separate case involving online auctions, legal staff found evidence of unlicensed activity by a respondent and recommended a civil penalty. Commissioners discussed when online auctions came under the commission's regulatory purview and noted the authority to regulate online auctions was clarified after a prior meeting; staff said the complaint opened just after that clarification. The commission voted to impose a $250 civil penalty for unlicensed activity.
The commission also reviewed a consumer dispute over whether a 24-year-old mixer advertised as "brand new" was misrepresented. Legal counsel and commissioners said the matter appears to be a civil dispute better suited to small-claims court; the commission dismissed the complaint and advised the complainant to consider civil remedies.
All dismissal motions and the $250 penalty motion were adopted by voice vote with commissioners registering aye. Commissioners who participated in votes were Ed Knight, Jeff Morris and Jay White.
Legal counsel noted an administrative hearing set for the commission's August meeting was continued and that the administrative law judge suggested mediation; the commission authorized the executive director to approve any settlement reached through mediation on the commission's behalf.
Commissioners did not identify additional sanctions beyond the $250 penalty in the unlicensed-activity matter and directed staff to continue enforcement where appropriate.

