Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Flag Lots topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission discusses flag‑lot policy options, safety and address issues
Summary
Staff presented examples of flag‑lot (stem/access) proposals and model ordinances from nearby cities. Commissioners raised concerns about land‑locking, required improvements, emergency access/turnarounds, fire hydrant proximity, addressing/mail delivery and potential unintended impacts on subdivision planning.
Hooper City planning staff briefed the commission on recurring public inquiries about flag lots (lots accessed by a narrow driveway/stem from a public street) and presented model language used by neighboring jurisdictions to regulate stems, materials, fire access and lot‑size thresholds.
Staff said other cities (West Point, West Haven, Plain City) generally process flag‑lot requests with stricter controls: stems typically 20–30 feet wide, paved to city standards, landscaped edges, and fire‑approved turnarounds. Some cities limit stem length or require a fire hydrant within a specified distance (for example, within 250 feet) to allow longer stems. Staff also said many jurisdictions set a minimum parent‑lot size (often 125%–150% of the underlying zone) before flag‑lot subdivision is permitted.
Commissioners expressed mixed views. Several said they were open to allowing flag lots in limited circumstances (for example, truly landlocked parcels that cannot be otherwise accessed) but emphasized they did not want to create incentives to avoid stub‑road requirements in new subdivisions. Commissioners raised practical concerns: addressing and mailbox placement for flag lots, ensuring emergency‑vehicle access, clarifying whether stems count toward minimum lot area, and avoiding unintended encouragement of small‑scale subdivision of larger parcels.
Staff suggested any ordinance should require paved stems, a fire‑approved turnaround, and constraints on stem length tied to hydrant proximity, and recommended conversations with the post office and the city’s public‑works and fire departments for operational details. Commissioners asked staff to contact Ryan Hill (a former planning commissioner) for historical context on why the city previously restricted flag lots and to bring draft ordinance language for review.
No formal policy change was adopted at the meeting. Staff said they will compile model language, consult public‑works and fire officials, and return draft ordinance text for commission review.
