Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Procedures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council adopts revised rules of procedure after debate over public-speaking limits
Summary
Council adopted updated Rules of Procedure for City Council by 6''1, with one member opposed. The revisions retained a 15-minute per-side guideline for zoning public hearings while adding explicit language allowing the presiding officer to apportion time among many speakers; the clerk will incorporate oral amendments stated on the record.
The Durham City Council voted to adopt revised Rules of Procedure after an extended debate over public-speaking time for zoning public hearings and the presiding officer''s discretion. The measure passed 6''1, with Councilmember Cook recorded as the lone no vote.
The procedures committee and city attorney staff had circulated draft revisions months earlier; the council''s debate focused on a retained provision that references a 15-minute per-side allotment for zoning public hearing items. Several speakers from the public and councilmembers argued the language could be read to limit individual residents to shorter times when many people wish to speak.
To address those concerns the council added language making clear that the presiding officer has discretion, subject to appeal to the full council, to shorten, fix or apportion time among speakers when numerous proponents or opponents appear. The new text also distinguishes "applicants" from "proponents" so that residents who support a project are not grouped together with the applicant''s presentation time.
Councilmembers emphasized that the 15-minute per-side wording is a longstanding line in the procedures and that, in practice, presiding officers have typically allowed many residents to speak by shortening individual times (for example to two minutes) when attendance is large. The mayor and several members said they had routinely used that discretion and that the additional paragraph codifies the practice and clarifies appeals.
The clerk noted that two on-the-record oral edits read aloud during the meeting would be incorporated into the final published version of the rules and that she would circulate a redline showing where the changes appear.
The final vote was recorded as 6''1; the formal motion to adopt the revised procedures was moved and seconded on the record. Councilmember Cook said she would not support the version as originally presented but stated afterward that she was comfortable with the added language; the roll call showed a no vote on the recorded tally.
The revised rules will replace the earlier procedures and will be added to the council''s official records with the clerk''s finalized pagination and incorporated oral amendments.
