Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Workforce topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District previews staff engagement survey results; administration to analyze comments and disaggregate by position
Summary
Administration presented initial results from a March staff engagement survey; about 406 respondents provided benchmark data on work environment, professional development and communication. The district plans further analysis and a published executive summary in June.
Get email alerts on the Workforce topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District administration presented an initial review of the staff engagement survey conducted March 17–28, 2025. The survey produced 406 responses across certified and support staff and covered topics including work environment, supervisory support, professional development, communication and belonging.
Administration summarized high‑level findings: most respondents rated their overall work environment positively and reported feeling supported by building administrators. Areas with higher neutral or mixed responses included perceptions of central‑office communication and the relevance of professional development. Participation and belonging indicators were generally positive — a majority said they feel respected and proud to be part of the district — but some respondents indicated they are unsure about remaining two years or about opportunities to participate in decisions affecting their work.
Administrators said the data will be disaggregated by position and building, and qualitative comments will be summarized. Next steps include publishing an executive summary in June, repeating the survey twice a year starting in 2025–26 to track trends, and preparing targeted action plans. Board members asked about anonymity (administration confirmed the survey was anonymous), question consistency for year‑to‑year comparison, and whether exit surveys are used for retirees; administration said exit surveys exist and some retirees request follow‑up conversations.
Why it matters: Regular engagement measurement can inform retention, professional development and central‑office practices. The district will use the results to set priorities and target supports where needed, and plans to continue the survey as an ongoing benchmark.

