Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Lvn Regulations topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board discusses draft regulations to define LVN respiratory tasks in home and community settings

3798681 · June 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board reviewed conceptual regulation language to specify which respiratory tasks licensed vocational nurses may perform in home and community-based settings, employer training standards and demonstrated competency processes; staff will hold stakeholder meetings and continue revisions with CSRC and other groups.

Board staff presented conceptual regulatory language intended to specify when licensed vocational nurses (LVNs) may perform certain respiratory care tasks in home-health and community-based settings, describe employer-provided patient-specific training standards, and set guidelines for demonstrated limited-competency certification.

Katie (board staff) said the draft rules focus on three areas: defining permissible tasks, establishing employer training standards, and outlining demonstrated limited competency processes. Staff reported meetings with the California Society for Respiratory Care (CSRC) and with CAMPS (California Association for Medical Product Suppliers or a similarly named stakeholder group) and said CSRC has been responsive while CAMPS raised concerns about aspects that might require statutory change.

The language remains conceptual; staff asked for board feedback and committed to hosting a dedicated stakeholder meeting so interested parties could provide detailed input. One public commenter thanked the board for the collaborative process and urged curriculum development to build LVN confidence for expanded roles. Staff said they will continue outreach and that any changes that exceed current statutory authority would require legislative amendments.

Board members characterized the process as thoughtful and deliberative and instructed staff to continue stakeholder engagement before any formal regulatory filing.