Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Facilities topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Buildings and grounds committee reviews camera review, Smallsfield fence and tennis-court projects; legal steps for Market Street property sale explained

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the June 9 committee meeting, staff reported a districtwide camera review with Hannah Penn next in line, proposed fence and paving work at Smallsfield, and Attorney Gettle outlined court and bidding options for a potential sale of district property on Market Street.

Director Liggins opened the buildings and grounds segment at the June 9 York City School District committee meeting and invited facilities staff to report on ongoing projects, security-camera review and proposed repairs at district fields.

Mister Haynes told the committee a districtwide camera review is underway and that Hannah Penn is the next school scheduled for improvements; he said camera placement details were redacted from the public packet on the recommendation of the district’s attorney. Haynes said district staff would provide placement plans directly to board members if requested.

Two Smallsfield projects were described: replacement of aged chain-link fencing around fields and buildings, and paving and repairs at a deteriorated tennis court to support band practice and other events. “It’ll make that whole field area look very nice when it’s done,” Haynes said, describing fence replacement and paving to address decay and cracked surfaces.

Board members asked whether the buildings-and-grounds project list was current; Haynes said he used last month’s list because an updated one was not provided but asked the department to supply monthly updates going forward. Directors also requested a follow-up on Lindbergh, where staff said the district is awaiting clarity about a Market Street property before deciding whether to keep, repurpose or place Lindbergh on the market. Haynes said the next steps hinge on what is decided about Market Street.

Attorney Gettle explained the legal alternatives for selling district property. He told the committee there are three common approaches: a public sale with a court process, a bid process for sales generally, and a court approval route for private sales that requires supporting the purchase price with appraisals. He said an exemption exists for sales to certain nonprofit organizations. In his words: “There’s a couple different alternatives when you go to sell a, a piece of property. If it’s gonna be sold privately, there has to be a bid process and it it has to be, yeah, bid process. You can also go into court, or that’s with a public sale. With a private sale, you'd have to go into court and support a purchase price with appraisals... The only exception to that is if you're selling to, I believe, a nonprofit organization is an exemption to that process.”

Board members asked about electronic communications and campus-wide systems; Haynes said the chief indicated district communications hardware is old and likely will require replacement work later in the year.

Ending: The committee requested regular monthly updates to the buildings-and-grounds project list and asked staff to provide camera-placement maps directly to board members as needed; no formal votes were taken.