Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tif Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Duluth council tables TIF development-incentives policy for one week to allow edits
Summary
Councilors voted to table Resolution 393, a proposed city policy on tax-increment financing development incentives, for one week to allow authors and staff to incorporate clarifying language, neighborhood considerations and risk-assessment language from other cities.
Get email alerts on the Tif Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Duluth City Council voted during its meeting to table Resolution 393, a proposed policy on development incentives for tax-increment financing (TIF), for one week to allow authors and staff to incorporate additional language and respond to councilors’ concerns.
Councilor Forsman introduced the resolution and said authors wanted time to capture an upcoming TIF proposal and to ensure the policy would be available before a DITA meeting scheduled for later in the month. Councilor Dirwachter moved to table the resolution for one meeting; the motion passed after a voice vote and the chair stated the resolution would be tabled until the next meeting.
Several councilors said they support adopting a robust TIF policy but wanted time to add provisions drawn from other cities. Councilor Dirwachter and others cited Rochester’s clear evaluation criteria and Minneapolis’s economic-analysis and risk-assessment language as possible additions. Councilors also raised neighborhood-specific concerns such as displacement and the need to clarify definitions and application materials so the public can understand the process.
City attorney staff told councilors they could support drafting amendments on the proposed timetable and that their hard deadline to produce language for review would be noon on Thursday.
Councilors noted a pending DITA meeting on June 25 where a TIF proposal might be considered; authors said they want the policy in place before that meeting but preferred a one-week delay to gather additional language and public input. The council did not vote on the policy itself; the formal action taken was to table the resolution for one meeting.
