Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Redevelopment And Agency Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council directs CRA board to start national search, approves interim term and requests CLA report
Summary
The council approved a set of amendments directing the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) board to begin a national search for a permanent executive, approved an interim one-year term for the agency’s current manager with reporting milestones, and asked the CLA for a written report; the final motion passed 11-0.
Get email alerts on the Redevelopment And Agency Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The City Council approved a package of amendments and instructions related to leadership and the search process at the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA), directing the CRA board to begin a national search, authorizing an interim term for the agency’s current manager, and asking the Chief Legislative Analyst to report back to council.
Councilmember Kevin Pacheco introduced an amending motion that—after discussion and a removal of one clause at the request of colleagues—set a one-year interim term for the agency’s current executive with provisions for the CRA board to initiate a national recruitment roughly nine months into that period and to report back to council by month 11 so the council can consider next steps at month 12.
Councilmembers debated potential legal and settlement issues related to administrative claims against the agency and asked that those matters be handled, if necessary, in closed session. Several members also raised concerns about authorizing the CRA board chairperson to negotiate contracts; the chair’s role language was removed from the motion before final action.
The Chief Legislative Analyst and City Administrative Officer were asked to provide a written report with a consolidated set of suggestions and to return to council within the timeline specified. The council recorded the final vote on the amended report as 11 ayes; members stressed a need for committee and staff coordination on search criteria, labor-unit engagement and school-district land-use coordination.

