Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy Transmission topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Assembly passes broad energy bill proposing public financing and transmission reforms amid sharp debate
Summary
AB 825, a measure proposing a suite of actions to lower electricity bills — including public financing for transmission and addressing wildfire mitigation costs — passed the Assembly 45–5 after a contested floor debate centering on state role, costs and permitting.
Assembly Bill 825, introduced by Assemblymember Lauren Petrie‑Norris, passed the Assembly on May 20 after extensive floor debate over the state's role in financing and building electricity transmission and reducing ratepayer costs.
Assemblymember Lauren Petrie‑Norris, the bill’s author, said AB 825 targets primary cost drivers of high electricity rates in California — wildfire mitigation expenses, transmission financing costs, permitting delays and certain ratepayer‑funded public purpose programs. Petrie‑Norris told colleagues the proposal could save Californians an estimated $1 billion to $2 billion a year if implemented as a package.
Opponents including Assemblymember Dixon and Assemblymember De Maio described the bill as risky and warned it could amount to a state takeover of energy infrastructure that would slow projects, add debt and raise long‑term costs for ratepayers. Assemblymember De Maio called it a “Trojan horse” and pointed to past state projects he viewed as unsuccessful.
Supporters including Assemblymember Rogers and the author said the state should explore ways to lower borrowing costs and consider public financing and public‑private partnerships for transmission to reduce ratepayer costs, especially as utilities' financing approaches have pushed costs into rate cases.
Petrie‑Norris said public financing under the proposal would not have the state directly build every project but would create a framework for public investment as part of broader financing arrangements. She emphasized analysis showing potential savings by replacing investor‑owned utilities’ higher borrowing costs with lower‑cost public financing.
The Assembly approved AB 825 on a 45–5 vote. The bill will move to the Senate, where further committee work and amendments are expected.
