Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Stormwater Drainage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Angola Board of Works approves $75,300 cleanup of Fountain Subdivision retention pond after spring flooding
Summary
The Angola Board of Works on June 2 approved work to dredge and restore the retention pond in the Fountain Subdivision after heavy spring rains caused flooding in nearby Harrington Heights. The city will seek cost recovery from the private owner but legal limits may cap recovery.
Get email alerts on the Stormwater Drainage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Angola Board of Works on Monday, June 2 approved a contract to clean and restore the retention pond in the Fountain Subdivision at an estimated cost of $75,300.
The work was approved after board members discussed spring flooding that affected the neighboring Harrington Heights subdivision, where residents were reportedly trapped in their homes for several days and only a city vehicle sustained known property damage. The board directed staff to pursue the cleaning, obtain required permits from the Indiana Department of Transportation and seek recovery of costs from the current private owner.
The board approved the work after hearing that the pond had become filled with silt, overgrown with trees and brush, and was not holding water to its design capacity. City staff said they previously performed a limited cleanup and that the city had filed suit against a prior owner, identified in the meeting as Mr. Appleton. That suit resulted in a court order directing the owner to clean the pond and allowing the city to send the bill to him; staff reported the city has not yet attempted to enforce the judgment. One staff speaker said the outstanding judgment was about $1,100, though that figure was presented as approximate.
Amanda, a staff member, reported the last contractor quote for a complete dredge was $75,300 and described the contractor scope as including construction of a temporary access drive, excavation to the original design elevation, placement of erosion-control blanket, and removal of the temporary drive after completion. Meeting discussion specified the planned work would remove vegetation and organic material down to the design elevation but would not include reengineering the outlet piping or changing the height of the pond wall.
Kim, a staff member, told the board there is a state-law mechanism allowing the city to enter private property to remedy an ordinance violation and seek reimbursement, but that statute limits recoverable costs to either $10,000 or $20,000 (the precise cap was not resolved in the discussion). Kim said a court likely would not award the full $75,300 against a private individual of limited means and noted the unusual factual circumstances of the sale of the property after the litigation began.
Board members and staff also discussed broader preventive steps. Several members urged forming a homeowners association in the Fountain Subdivision to take ownership and ongoing maintenance responsibility for the pond; staff said some residents support an association and some do not. The board noted the city has roughly a dozen retention ponds within its jurisdiction and that regular checks are complaint-based rather than proactive.
The motion to proceed with the dredge and restoration was moved and seconded and carried with members signaling assent. The board did not record individual roll-call votes in the transcript; all present signaled “aye.”
Next steps recorded in the meeting: staff will secure any required INDOT permits for access, contract for the work described in the quote, and pursue cost recovery from the current owner within the limits identified by state law. A timeline for the work and details of enforcement were not specified during the meeting.
The board's next scheduled meeting was set for Monday, July 7.

