Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan Implementation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Town planner summarizes boards’ roadblocks and recommended actions from the comprehensive plan
Summary
Richmond’s town planner presented a condensed review of action items from the comprehensive plan after soliciting input from multiple boards and commissions, highlighting needs around affordable housing outreach, transfer development rights, volunteer capacity, trail mapping and economic development focus.
Town Planner Holly Gillette presented May 20 a consolidated summary of responses from boards and commissions about action items in Richmond’s comprehensive plan and recommended council support for several priorities.
Gillette told the council she had circulated the plan’s action items to commissions and asked each body to identify roadblocks and possible town actions to help complete assigned tasks. Responses varied: the Conservation Commission described trail inventories and outreach events and requested increased volunteer support; the Land Trust asked for a town coordinator or project manager to help spearhead initiatives; the EDC requested clarity of mission and a road map to focus economic development work; and the affordable‑housing committee recommended more frequent meetings and public education workshops to address misinformation about low‑ and moderate‑income (LMI) housing.
The planning board selected 11 action items to prioritize and asked the council for clearer direction on the town’s goals (for example, whether to pursue a Main Street-style corridor or design standards). Gillette said her own two priorities for the coming year are (1) sponsoring public meetings to educate residents about LMI housing and (2) exploring a transfer‑of‑development‑rights (TDR) program; she recommended solicitor assistance to draft TDR language.
Councilors discussed next steps: scheduling public workshops on housing, increasing affordable‑housing committee frequency, identifying parcels suitable for recreation or mountain biking with the land trust, and pursuing state and grant resources for trail mapping and DPW in‑kind assistance. The planner said land‑evidence records and MapGeo GIS tools can be used to research parcel restrictions and that the land trust trustees can often offer quick answers about parcel use restrictions.
No formal council vote was required for the planner’s report; the presentation produced requests for follow‑up items and for particular boards to convene or provide documents to staff for further work.
