The Minnesota House on May 16 passed House File 3321, a technical “corrections” or reviser vehicle bill that lawmakers said will be used if errors are discovered in enacted bills later in the session. Representative Tina Liebling of Olmsted, the author on the floor, described the measure as an administrative vehicle rather than a substantive policy change and asked legislators to support sending it to the Senate as a placeholder.

Members voted on the bill after the clerk reported it on the calendar. Representative Liebling told the chamber that "this is the annual corrections bill" and that "it is essentially a vehicle bill, so you can safely ignore the content of the bill." The clerk then took the roll; the House recorded 132 ayes and 2 nays and the bill was passed and its title agreed to.

The measure, as presented on the House floor, contains no changes to policy at this time; the author said the bill exists to receive later technical corrections that affected parties sign off on and the reviser would insert before final enactment. There were no amendments offered on the House floor and no debate on substantive policy.

If corrections are later proposed, the author said they will follow the standard process of sign‑offs and reviser insertion before any substantive language is adopted. The bill now proceeds to the Senate for consideration.

Timing and next steps: Because the bill functions as a vehicle, the content that could follow is contingent on future errors or technical fixes identified by members or staff and is not specified on the floor record for May 16.