Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ellis Act Housing Crisis Act Tenant Protections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee conditions approval of TOC project on tenant protections after Ellis Act / Housing Crisis Act conflict
Summary
The committee upheld most approvals for a 19‑unit Transit‑Oriented Communities project at 5271 West Sunset Boulevard but added a condition requiring compliance with state tenant‑protection laws, giving existing tenants the right to remain until six months before construction and requiring compliance with relocation benefits.
The Planning and Land Use Committee resolved a contested Transit‑Oriented Communities (TOC) project at 5271 West Sunset Boulevard by upholding the City Planning Commission's determinations with modifications to protect existing tenants.
The project is a four‑story mixed‑use building with 19 dwelling units and roughly 600 square feet of commercial space; two units are reserved for extremely low‑income occupancy. The 5271 West Sunset Boulevard Tenants Union and tenants raised due‑process and displacement concerns after the property owner filed an Ellis Act withdrawal in February 2024. Appellants said tenants faced eviction pressure and that the administrative record and timelines had not respected tenant protections in the California Housing Crisis Act of 2019 (often referenced as the HCA / SB‑8‑era protections).
Planning staff summarized the entitlement history: the director approved the TOC and project permit compliance and adopted a categorical exemption; the CPC denied the appeal; the matter then advanced under a council 245 motion. The Council District 13 office and the Housing Department explained a conflict between the Ellis Act process (state law allowing withdrawal from rental market) and the Housing Crisis Act's timing and relocation protections, which require tenants be permitted to remain until six months prior to the start of construction and entitle qualifying tenants to relocation benefits and a right of first refusal.
After discussion the applicant agreed to provide a six‑month extension to tenants and the committee adopted a motion that effectively upheld the CPC approvals while adding a condition requiring the applicant to comply with applicable state laws (Ellis Act and Housing Crisis Act), provide tenants a written notice of their right to remain until six months prior to construction (and to extend tenancy if construction cannot start within that period), and ensure tenants receive relocation benefits required by law.
The committee recorded a 4‑1 vote (four ayes, one no from Councilmember Grama; Councilmember Raman was absent). Committee members and district staff said the condition aims to balance housing production and protections for existing protected tenants, while acknowledging the statutory conflicts that require more robust city‑level procedures in future cases.
