Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Transgender Sports topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parent urges TTUSD to sue NIAA over policy on transgender athletes; board declines to discuss
Summary
At public comment May 21 a resident asked the board to file suit seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the Nevada Interscholastic Activities Association, saying the NIAA policy conflicts with education‑code protections for students who compete consistent with their gender identity. Trustees did not debate the request at the meeting.
A Truckee resident urged the Tahoe‑Truckee Unified School District Board of Trustees on May 21 to take legal action against the Nevada Interscholastic Activities Association (NIAA), saying a recent NIAA policy conflicts with statutory protections allowing students to compete consistent with their gender identity.
Beth Curtis, identifying herself as a 26‑year resident of Truckee and a representative of teachers across the state, said she emailed the district’s attorney before the meeting and asked the district to consider filing a complaint seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to have the NIAA policy declared unlawful. Curtis said she believes the NIAA policy “clearly conflicts with education code section 221.5F” (as cited in her remarks) and warned the board that, without a CDE waiver, a citizen complaint could prompt state investigation and legal exposure.
Curtis said she supports transgender students’ right to play now and in future seasons and urged the board to send a message of support to students who may feel excluded. After public comment concluded, President Driller said she would opt out of the upcoming conversation and the board did not take up a response or motion on Curtis’s request at the meeting.
What was said Curtis: “With no CDE waiver in place, the board is basically declaring to the public that the district is now violating the law… Anyone sues, you're sitting ducks.” She urged the district to pursue relief against the NIAA and cited national coverage of potential litigation by the ACLU as context.
Board response Trustees closed public comment and moved to the next agenda item. Superintendent Kramer and board members did not place the request on the agenda or provide a formal response during the meeting; President Driller said she was stepping aside from further conversation that evening for personal reasons.
Note on legal references Curtis referred repeatedly to an “education code” section in her remarks; the board did not cite or endorse a statutory interpretation at the meeting and took no formal action. Any legal claim or lawsuit would be subject to counsel review and the board’s decision‑making process beyond this public comment period.
