Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Landuse Grand Targhee Deis topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Teton County to finalize cooperating-agency comments opposing Grand Targhee boundary expansion
Summary
Commissioners instructed staff to refine and post a single cooperating-agency comment letter on the Caribou-Targhee National Forest draft EIS, emphasizing preference for no boundary expansion (alternative 3), calling out analytical gaps, and identifying items the county supports.
Teton County commissioners reviewed a draft cooperating-agency comment letter June 9 on the Caribou-Targhee National Forest's draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) for the proposed Grand Targhee Resort expansion and instructed staff to finalize the letter for public posting and comment.
Why it matters: The county's draft letter, as revised in the meeting, expresses a preference for "alternative 3," which staff described as the no-boundary-expansion option, with modifications. Public-works project manager Chris Culligan summarized the board's direction: the county supports no boundary expansion, seeks that the Forest Service and resort coordinate on needed avalanche mitigation outside resort boundaries, and prefers that on-mountain dining and similar commercial services be hosted on private lands rather than within the special-use-permit boundary.
Commissioners asked staff to sharpen the letter in three ways: (1) pull out and cite specific county plans and policies (for example, relevant passages from the county comprehensive plan) as supporting exhibits; (2) clearly identify where they believe the DEIS analysis is incomplete or insufficient (for example, socioeconomic effects, water quality, wildfire risk, and cost of community services); and (3) list elements of the DEIS the board supports (such as some lift improvements inbounds, beginner-terrain improvements near the base, and summer trail connections). Commissioner comments repeatedly asked that the letter separate technical adequacy critiques from substantive policy preferences so the county preserves its role as a cooperating agency.
Process and timeline: Chris Culligan told the board he will incorporate commissioner edits and return a revised draft to staff by Thursday, with a goal of posting the final draft for public comment next week and bringing the letter back under outgoing correspondence for possible approval at the board's next regular meeting. The county has a DEIS comment deadline of June 20, which staff cited as the controlling schedule.
Ending: Staff will refine the cooperating-agency letter to include clear sections on (a) analytical deficiencies, (b) items the county supports, and (c) the county's preference for no boundary expansion (alternative 3) subject to the specified modifications and to the county's regulatory review of any private-land development that may follow. The board asked for timely circulation so members and the public can review before the June 20 deadline.
