Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Regulations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning staff wins commission backing for multiple UDO and subdivision text amendments
Summary
The Oswego Planning and Zoning Commission voted to recommend a package of text amendments to the Subdivision and Development Control Regulations and to the Unified Development Ordinance, covering submittals, road construction detail, minor-subdivision thresholds, site-plan and PUD amendment rules, building transparency and façade standards, and several use-specific clarifications.
The Oswego Planning and Zoning Commission voted to recommend a package of text amendments to the Subdivision and Development Control Regulations and to the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) after a staff presentation that summarized numerous clarifications and policy changes.
Jeff (staff) said the proposed changes to the subdivision regulations (section 6.09) update submittal requirements for final site-plan and final plat review and revise a construction detail diagram (OSWR1) to match Illinois Department of Transportation pavement patch standards (a 2-foot-wide pavement patch with specified hot-mix asphalt and subbase). Staff recommended the updates to align submittal checklists with engineering and GIS requirements.
Key UDO changes recommended by staff and recommended by the commission included: clarifying public-notice requirements for annexation agreements; redefining minor subdivisions to be any division creating three or fewer lots (removing an exception tied to proximity to major roadways); adjusting thresholds that trigger site-plan and PUD major-amendment review (raising or clarifying when changes to gross floor area, building height, or surface area require full commission review versus staff approval); allowing engineering discretion to consider new/semi-pervious surfaces when computing impervious coverage; revised building-facade and transparency rules (including how window area is measured); limiting where EIFS/synthetic stucco is allowed at low heights; treating certain video-gaming uses as special-use permit applications (with incidental gaming still licensed through separate village licensing procedures); re-inserting a one-mile spacing rule among certain cannabis dispensaries that the village had adopted in ordinance in 2023; adding special-use language for specialty driving schools (motorcycle, truck); clarifying poultry/chicken-coop rules and excluding tattoo and permanent-makeup uses from home-based business allowances; and adding state EV-charging readiness language to parking requirements.
Staff also proposed changes to residential parking placement (restricting parking in front yards), eliminated a separate maximum-number-of-spaces rule in favor of existing impervious-coverage limits, and adjusted driveway/apron widths to accommodate industrial uses and truck turning. The amendments include a revised definition of common open space to guide when larger administrative setback adjustments apply.
Commissioners asked clarifying questions — for example about how “common open space” is defined for setback adjustments (staff said only property owned/maintained by public entities or certain common-ownership entities qualifies), how imperviousness will be judged for newer paver technologies (staff said the village engineer would have discretion to evaluate semipervious products and may require maintenance records), and how corner/front yard designations will be decided on older downtown lots (staff said designations are established when a property change is under review and may be set as part of that review).
After discussion the commission moved to recommend approval of the proposed text amendments to sections identified in the staff packet; the motion passed by roll-call vote.
