Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Event Permits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Manhattan City committee denies Adidas post-event permit, unanimously approves Saint Anthony’s fundraiser
Summary
A Manhattan City permitting committee unanimously denied a post-event permit request for an Adidas event described as ‘‘load in/load out only’’ and approved a multi-day fundraiser permit for Saint Anthony’s; committee members discussed post-facto approvals driven by SIPRA timelines and ongoing coordination with SAPO and NYPD.
Get email alerts on the Event Permits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A Manhattan City permitting committee discussed a string of event permit items and unanimously denied a post-event permit for an Adidas event while approving a multi-day fundraiser permit for Saint Anthony’s, staff said.
Staff member said the Adidas application was treated as a ‘‘load in load out only’’ request and that the event was a ‘‘no show,’’ prompting a unanimous denial. Staff member also reported that the Saint Anthony’s multi-day fundraiser permit was ‘‘unanimous approved.’’
The committee discussed the frequency of post-facto approvals and the limits set by SIPRA. ‘‘As far as I'm aware, yes. Because of the timelines that SIPRA requires,’’ Staff member said, adding that the committee often faces an ‘‘unfortunate trade off’’ between SIPRA timelines and the short notice typical of small pop-up events.
A resident questioned whether the committee will continue to process many permits after events: ‘‘I just think it's so sad that you guys do all this work for and all these events have already happened. Is that always gonna be the case?’’ Committee members and staff responded that, in practice, compliant applications are generally approved even when the review is post-facto, and that the applicant’s appearance at committee meetings can provide opportunities for staff feedback on placement, notification and other logistics. ‘‘The appearance of the applicant is also often useful because they're appearing before the event and we can give them useful feedback about placement and notification and, encourage them to do the event better,’’ a committee member said.
Members also described ongoing operational coordination with SAPO and the New York Police Department on street-level incidents tied to events. Staff said committee leadership and staff follow up in real time on incidents and sometimes join walkthroughs with SAPO and NYPD. A resident raised a specific inquiry about a separate ‘‘brown bag’’ grilling event at 218 Thompson Street; the resident said the fire department responded and provided staff with photos and video, but the transcript did not record a final disposition for that specific item.
Staff noted that the agenda included 18 resolutions to be voted on at the meeting and that items 19 through 34 were listed as FYI renewals. The transcript records the committee chair or staff prompting clarifying questions and arranging for a microphone for a member identified as Susanna, but the record provided to the article did not list individual vote roll calls.
Committee discussion emphasized two operational points: that SIPRA timelines mean some approvals will necessarily be post-facto, and that committee interaction with applicants and with SAPO/NYPD provides opportunities for corrective action and education even when a formal vote occurs after an event.

