Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Policies Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
School committee approves first read of Section D budget policies, refers several items to finance subcommittee
Summary
The Methuen School Committee approved Section D (fiscal management and budget) on first reading with amendments, removed outdated procedural policies, and referred chargebacks, certain audit and fund-balance items, and charter cross-checks to the finance subcommittee for further review.
The Methuen School Committee voted Oct. 21 to approve Section D of the policy manual (fiscal management and budget) on first reading, adopting many MASC-recommended updates, striking out dated procedural items, and referring specific finance-related items to the finance subcommittee for additional review.
Vice Chair Keegan moved to adopt the amendments the committee discussed and to refer several items — including municipal chargebacks policy (DEA), unexpended school department funds procedures (DIB), and audit/audit-procurement cross-checks — to the finance subcommittee. Member Shabilia seconded the recommendation to approve the section in form with those referrals; the motion carried.
Committee discussion covered multiple points. Members said MASC’s DB, DBC and related model language clarifies budget goals and budget-adoption procedures and that the city charter governs the final adoption authority for the school budget. Members asked that references to specific software and vendor names (for example, “Munis”) be removed or made evergreen in the policy text so that the manual does not rely on vendor-specific terminology.
The committee also discussed student activity account auditing thresholds. The draft policy uses a common MASC provision stating that accounts exceeding $25,000 should be considered for outside audit; members noted that the high school account has previously been allowed a $50,000 level and directed staff to verify current practice and align policy language with existing approvals.
Several procedural files — including purchasing and credit-card procedures that are administrative rather than policy — were recommended for removal from the policy manual and instead handled in administration procedures. The committee asked finance and legal staff to verify consistency with Massachusetts procurement law (M.G.L. c.30B) and the city charter before final adoption.
The motion to approve Section D in form, with the amendments and referrals to the finance subcommittee, passed by voice vote. The committee will receive a clean second-read packet addressing the referred items and any charter or procurement cross-checks.
