Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cell Phone Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates proposed cell-phone policy, vendor pouches and cost allocation
Summary
At first reading the board discussed a proposed cell-phone policy that would require students to secure phones in pouches during the day; members debated cost, logistics and who should pay for the pouches and whether staff time would be required to manage them.
The Hamilton County Board of Education held a first reading of a proposed cell-phone policy and discussed logistical and budget questions about locking devices in classroom pouches. The policy in the packet would permit principals discretion over phone use; a vendor quote for pouches and unlocking devices was discussed as one implementation option.
Staff said a vendor estimate gave a unit cost of about $30 per pouch and provided two quantity scenarios: roughly 12,000 pouches to cover economically disadvantaged students in middle and high school, or about 21,000 pouches to cover all middle and high school students. Staff said the district would likely have to purchase pouches up front and then collect payment from families if the policy requires parents to buy their child a pouch; board members raised concerns about creating barriers for participation and adding work for teachers who would manage the devices.
Board members raised several operational questions: who would be responsible for distributing and locking devices, whether pouches can be opened in an emergency (staff said unlocking devices would be provided), and whether purchasing pouches is a parental responsibility or district expense. Some trustees favored a low-tech trial (wall-mounted pouches in classrooms) and asked staff to survey teachers during the district’s upcoming professional learning days to gauge operational feasibility. Other trustees opposed spending district funds for the pouches given competing classroom supply needs.
Staff said the current policy already allows principals discretion during lunchtime and that the district’s draft policy language is intended to remain in compliance with Tennessee code requiring access to a device in emergency situations. The board did not vote on a final policy; members asked staff to conduct a teacher pulse check and return with operational cost options.
Ending: Staff will provide pricing options, implementation logistics, and survey results from staff; the board indicated it would consider a pilot approach before any district-wide purchase or requirement.
