Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use And Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves rezoning to allow Miramar rehabilitation, towers after linked comprehensive plan change
Summary
The Sarasota City Commission voted unanimously on July 7 to rezone part of the Miramar site from Downtown Core to Downtown Bayfront, a step commissioners said is necessary to secure private financing to rehabilitate the 1922 Miramar Apartments while allowing taller residential towers behind the historic building.
The Sarasota City Commission voted unanimously on July 7 to rezone part of the Miramar site at 65 South Palm Avenue and 136 Miramar Court from Downtown Core to Downtown Bayfront, clearing a path for adaptive reuse of the 1922 Miramar Apartments and the construction of two residential towers behind and above a rehabilitated historic structure.
The vote followed a separate and earlier approval by the commission on second reading of a related comprehensive-plan amendment that moved implementing text into the city’s land-development regulations and made Downtown Bayfront the official mapping mechanism for primary grid streets. City staff and the applicant told commissioners the two steps must both succeed for the project’s proffers and conditions to take effect.
Why it matters: The applicant and its architects said increased residential density on the non‑historic portion of the site is the economic engine that will finance full rehabilitation of the Miramar building, preserve its 1922 character and return active retail and street-level uses to Palm Avenue and Miramar Court. City staff and the planning board found the proposals consistent with the Sarasota City Plan and the zoning code’s rezone standards.
What the rezone allows and requires: Under the approved ordinance, the rezoned piece can be built to an 18‑story height limit (the Downtown Bayfront implementing district permits taller towers than Downtown Core). The ordinance ties approval to a signed site plan within three years and places conditions on building coverage, the interstitial space between podium and tower and the coupling of new residential certificates of occupancy with completion of the Miramar rehabilitation. The applicant also proffered a number of community commitments that are included in the ordinance language that the commission adopted. If those conditions are not met within the specified time the rezoning approval may be rescinded.
Staff and board review: Development services staff reviewed the requests and recommended approval with conditions. The planning board recommended transmittal and adoption of the comprehensive-plan amendment and supported the rezoning at public hearings earlier this year.
Next steps and timeline: The applicant may move forward with a site plan submittal under the Downtown Bayfront standards. Because the rezoning was conditioned on items including the rehabilitation of the historic portion and submittal of a site plan, commission action and ordinance language tie the new density to the Miramar rehab rather than allowing unrestricted redevelopment.
Discussion points: Commissioners and the applicant emphasized the project’s preservation-focused approach and the built design choices intended to reduce massing impacts (setbacks and podium/tower massing) so the Miramar remains a pedestrian‑scaled element on Palm Avenue. Commissioners also noted the importance of enforceable, time‑bound proffers to ensure the preservation outcome is delivered.
Outcome: The commission approved the rezone ordinance 5‑0 after adopting the related comprehensive-plan amendment earlier in the meeting.
What to watch: Future filings will include a site-plan application, historic‑rehab construction documents and public notices for any local historic designation the applicant pursues once rehabilitation is complete.
