Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Events Tourism topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
McCall Chamber seeks closer city coordination as winter carnival budget, parade route and public-safety costs raise concerns
Summary
Chamber director Sheila Francis presented a strategic refocus toward business services and outlined a $116,000 draft winter-carnival budget with a roughly $20,000 shortfall; council members and the LOT committee discussed parade safety costs, LOT funding decisions and whether the city should supplement the event.
Sheila Francis, executive director of the McCall Area Chamber of Commerce and Visitors Bureau, asked the council July 17 for a future work session to discuss a closer partnership between the city and the chamber on marketing and community events and presented an overview of the chamber’s winter-carnival plans and budget.
Francis said the chamber’s board wants a different balance between tourism marketing and direct support for area businesses. She reviewed survey results and a draft budget for the planned 10‑day winter carnival (January 30–February 8), and told council members the event’s current draft budget is about $116,000 with a roughly $20,000 gap. “Most of our respondents were full‑time residents,” she said of a 710‑response survey; among business‑owner respondents, 68% preferred a 10‑day January format.
The presentation prompted questions about parade cost and public safety. The parade requires a state highway closure and certified traffic‑control staffing; McCall Police Chief Dallas Palmer explained the department’s resources are constrained when tens of thousands of visitors come to town for large events and said the department moved away from providing traffic control for such closures because doing so drew officers away from core public‑safety duties. That change is a main reason event organizers use a private traffic‑control contractor; those contractor costs account for a substantial portion of the parade line‑item in the carnival budget.
Dave Petty, a LOT (lodging‑occupancy‑tax) committee member and local business owner, told council the LOT committee did not award the chamber the full request and said the committee’s business‑owner members generally opposed a 10‑day format because it creates heavy traffic and parking impacts for downtown businesses. Petty also raised concerns about the chamber’s contracting and consultant expenses.
Council members and staff suggested several next steps rather than a one‑time city subsidy: gather clearer, business‑specific data on how downtown firms want events formatted and funded; consider altering the parade route to shorten closures and reduce contractor costs; evaluate differentiated parade entry fees for commercial participants (which could recover some traffic‑control costs); and explore earlier coordination between the chamber and city staff to reduce on‑the‑ground contractor needs.
Council members were hesitant to override the LOT committee’s award process; several said the council should not re‑allocate LOT funds that the committee already vetted. The council asked the chamber to provide a targeted survey of business‑license holders and to return with proposals for route changes, volunteer strategies, and cost‑reduction measures prior to any request for additional public funds.
Francis said the chamber is already pursuing ways to reengage local volunteers, lower barriers for sculpture entrants, and shift some marketing toward midweek and off‑peak visitors. She thanked the council for the feedback and said she would follow up with additional detail.
