Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Technology And Cellphone Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Niskayuna policy committee backs cellphone-equals-smartphone rule, recommends Yondr pouches to meet Aug. 1 state deadline
Summary
The Niskayuna Central School District policy committee recommended adopting a revised internet-enabled device policy that treats cell phones and smartphones the same and uses visual, on‑site storage as a temporary measure for grades 7–12, district staff said at a special policy committee meeting.
Get email alerts on the Student Technology And Cellphone Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Niskayuna Central School District policy committee recommended adopting a revised internet-enabled device policy that treats cell phones and smartphones the same and uses visual, on‑site storage as a temporary measure for grades 7–12, district staff said at a special policy committee meeting.
The discussion focused on how the district will implement state guidance that requires districts to publish an internet-enabled device policy by Aug. 1 to preserve a state aid allocation. Committee members and staff recommended using universal pouches (vendor: Yondr) for students in grades 7–12, relying on building principals to approve individual exceptions, and publishing accompanying regulations that set out progressive consequences and implementation details.
The committee said the draft will treat “cell phones” and “internet‑enabled devices” as equivalent categories, and will replace an itemized device list with language that covers current devices and “other devices” to account for changing technology. Staff recommended that any required instructional‑use headphones be wired and that the district keep a stock of wired headphones for classrooms.
On storage, staff proposed a two‑track approach: use Yondr pouches or similar visible storage for a large portion of students at secondary schools and use locked, labeled cell‑phone lockers or office storage for small cohorts (for example some sixth graders at Van Antwerp). Staff said backpacks and pockets are specifically disallowed by the state guidance, and that student lockers are acceptable under the guidance.
The committee discussed parent‑to‑student contact and said the district will continue to allow parents to call school main offices; district staff noted existing email contact for grades 9–12 will remain in place but the district is not recommending expanding parent email access to grades 7–8 at this time because of management complexity. Staff said the district will add courtesy student phones in buildings that lack them so students can call home during the day.
On discipline and enforcement, committee members and staff agreed the policy should not allow automatic suspension solely for a device violation. Instead, staff told the committee they will publish regulations with an escalated set of responses (for example, initial removal, parental contact, and longer‑term turn‑in requirements) and that parents and students will receive the regulation details at the start of the school year. Staff said the regulations will be the place to find the specific sequence of consequences; the board policy will remain broad and refer readers to the regulations and the code of conduct.
Staff presented cost estimates and state funding information. The recommended Yondr pouch purchase was estimated at about $30 per student (staff estimated a district net cost in the range of $45,000–$50,000, inclusive of pouches, magnets and onboarding), and staff said a state aid memo dated July 11 allocated a district share of roughly $22,225 payable Aug. 29; staff said the net local cost would be the total purchase cost minus that state contribution. Staff said the Yondr purchase is a one‑time capital‑style outlay and that replacement bags would be a local expense thereafter.
The committee also addressed translation and reporting requirements in the state guidance. Staff said the new guidance includes expectations for publication, translation into common local languages, and annual reporting and that those requirements have become more common with recent state mandates.
Next steps: staff will incorporate committee feedback into a revised draft and, because the state memo conditions the funding on a policy being published by Aug. 1, staff recommended the board hold a short special meeting before Aug. 1 to adopt the policy or a board‑level plan that preserves eligibility for the funding. The committee signaled support for moving the revised policy quickly to the board for action and for publishing the related regulations and parent notifications before school begins.
Ending: Committee members and staff described the Yondr pouches as a temporary, visible strategy to change school culture around device use while the district develops regulations and communication plans. Staff said the district will continue to evaluate storage options, expand or scale back Yondr use as needed, and report back to the board on implementation and discipline data.

