Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning and Zoning Commission continues Parvin Road rezoning and future‑land‑use amendment to Aug. 5 at applicant's request
Summary
Public hearings on a 373.5‑acre rezoning and a 191.7‑acre future‑land‑use amendment on the south side of Parvin Road were removed from the table and then continued to the Aug. 5 Planning & Zoning meeting at the applicant's request; both motions passed 7‑0.
At the July 15 Prosper Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the commission removed two companion public‑hearing items from the table and then granted the applicant's request to continue both items to the Aug. 5, 2025 meeting.
Item 4 sought to rezone 373.5 acres from agricultural use to a planned development allowing both single‑family and age‑restricted single‑family residences on a site described as the south side of Parvin Road approximately 2,070 feet east of FM 1385. The transcript records the case identifier in staff remarks in irregular formatting; staff described the parcel and noted the item had been the subject of a prior public hearing in June 2025 and was tabled to the current meeting.
Item 5 was the companion comprehensive‑plan amendment to change the future‑land‑use designation from medium‑density residential to high‑density residential for 191.7 acres located on the south side of Parvin Road at the same approximate location (comp‑24‑0002 as stated in the transcript). Staff reported the applicant requested additional time to adjust the proposal based on feedback the commission provided at the June public hearing; the applicant asked the commission to table both items to allow further refinement.
The procedural sequence on both items was: a motion to remove each item from the table, a public‑hearing opening, the applicant's request to table the matter to Aug. 5, and a motion to continue the public hearing and table the item. The motions to remove the items from the table and to table them until Aug. 5 were made and seconded on the record and each passed unanimously, 7‑0.
No public comment cards were received for these items during this meeting; staff said the applicant requested the continuance and will return with revisions at the Aug. 5 meeting. Because these are companion items (rezoning and comprehensive‑plan amendment for overlapping acreage), the commission and staff will consider the applicant's revised materials together at the continued public hearing.
Next steps: the public hearing for both the rezoning and comprehensive‑plan amendment will be held Aug. 5; the items will remain pending until the applicant returns with revisions and the commission takes further action.
