Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Shoreline studies truck-route ordinance, council raises enforcement and permit questions
Summary
City staff presented proposed Ordinance 10 38 to formalize truck routes and limit heavy trucks on non-designated streets; councilmembers pressed staff on enforcement, moving violations, and permit logistics and asked to bring the item back for action.
City traffic staff presented a proposed ordinance Monday to establish truck routes and restrict heavier commercial and construction vehicles from using local streets not designed for heavy loads.
Kendra Dedinsky, Shoreline’s city traffic engineer, told the council the draft Ordinance 10 38 would create a municipal code (SMC Chapter 10.12) defining truck routes and would amend SMC 12.15 (use of the right-of-way). The proposed rule would prohibit vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating above the threshold specified in the draft from traveling on non‑truck‑route streets except for local deliveries or when they have a city permit.
Dedinsky said the policy aligns with the transportation element and pavement-asset-management practices and responds to resident complaints about large trucks using local streets to cut through neighborhoods. Staff said adoption was not expected to require significant ongoing budget or staff resources beyond initial signing at key city entry points and permit-processing work.
Council members asked detailed questions about enforcement, parking, and whether repeat or pass-through violators would be handled as moving violations by police. One councilmember asked whether the ordinance covers large-vehicle parking; staff said existing municipal parking and traffic codes already limit parking of oversized vehicles in many residential areas and that the new ordinance focuses on route designation and permits.
On enforcement, staff said the primary mechanisms would be permit enforcement and code enforcement for construction operations or permitted oversize moves; the draft was not written as a moving-violation traffic code enforced by police. Council members and staff agreed there is an enforcement gap for unpermitted pass-through trips and asked staff to follow up with the police department on whether and how moving violations could be used in tandem with permit enforcement.
The draft includes exemptions for utilities and for vehicles making local deliveries. Staff described the permit practice as typically assigning permit conditions to specific vehicles and said, in general, drivers should carry a copy of any right-of-way permit when operating under one. For utilities and regular service providers, staff said the draft provides exemptions so blanket permits would not be required.
Several councilmembers urged that the ordinance not be adopted on the consent calendar and asked for the item to return as an action item after follow-up on enforcement mechanisms. No vote on Ordinance 10 38 was taken Monday; staff said they would return with additional details on enforcement, citations and permit logistics.
