Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Student Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board reviews annual restraint and seclusion report; district reports few recurring incidents

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The district presented its annual report on restraint and seclusion, saying there were six incidents involving five students, training requirements for staff, and reporting procedures to state agencies.

The board reviewed the district’s annual restraint and seclusion report, including the number of incidents, training practices and reporting requirements.

District staff reported there were six incidents involving five different students; one student accounted for multiple incidents. Staff emphasized the district does not maintain seclusion rooms designed to isolate students and that any episode in which a student is alone in a room is recorded as a seclusion incident for reporting purposes. Staff said physical restraint is used only as a last resort and only by personnel trained in CPI or a similar approved restraint system.

The district described training requirements: an initial eight-hour training for staff using the approved restraint system and a subsequent four-hour refresher every two years, with the majority of training time focused on de-escalation. Staff also explained post-incident procedures: parents are notified by the end of the day, and a debriefing meeting is held within 24 hours to review prevention steps and to consider supports such as behavior plans or psychological services. If an incident involves a preschool student, the district reported it submits additional reports to the state Department of Early Learning as well as to the Department of Education.

Board members asked clarifying questions about whether incidents were recurring and about the nature of reported injuries; staff said most incidents did not result in injury and described the reporting threshold for injury during restraint or seclusion.