Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Regional Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fresno supervisors decline to approve county participation in state-backed regional planning effort; item dies from lack of motion
Summary
The board did not approve a retroactive revenue agreement with the Central Valley Community Foundation to participate in a multi-county planning effort (Sierra San Joaquin Jobs Coalition). Members raised concerns about the foundation's local advocacy and potential effects on county planning; the item died for lack of motion.
Get email alerts on the Regional Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A proposed retroactive revenue agreement between Fresno County and the Central Valley Community Foundation to participate in a multi‑county planning and mapping effort died from lack of motion on July 8 after several supervisors voiced concerns about the convener's agenda and the project’s potential impacts.
Samantha Buck, deputy chief administrative officer, said the foundation is the state's designated convener for a program spanning Fresno, Madera, Tulare and Kings counties. The project would combine state data and county information to produce maps and recommendations about where to site clean-energy projects, water recharge and other land uses. The foundation offered up to $100,000 to reimburse county staff participation, Buck said.
Several supervisors reported skepticism about the convener and the steering process. One supervisor raised concerns about the foundation's public‑policy posture, citing its role in regional debates and saying the group had pushed to secure multiple seats on a transportation steering committee. Another supervisor said participation would not bind the county to any recommendations and that it was preferable to have a seat at the table rather than be excluded.
Supervisors also asked whether the county would be asked to change its general plan and whether state agencies would consider local priorities. Buck said the state agencies indicated the process was not expected to require general‑plan changes and that any final plan would return to the county for formal consideration.
After extended discussion, no supervisor moved to approve the agreement and the item "died from lack of motion." Several board members said they remain open to a staff seat at early technical discussions but wanted clearer guardrails before authorizing a formal agreement or acceptance of funds.

