Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Park Pool Maintenance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oskaloosa council weighs repairs and replacement options for Edmondson Park pool
Summary
City staff presented options ranging from targeted roof and shell repairs (about $230,000) to full reconstruction (estimated $2 million+); council gave staff direction to pursue repairs aimed at extending the pool's useful life roughly 10 years and explore fundraising for slide replacement.
City staff on June 2 asked the Oskaloosa City Council for direction on long-term plans for the public pool at Edmondson Park, presenting a range of repair and replacement options and cost estimates.
Sean Metcalfe, the city manager, told the council the pool has experienced leaking in the shell for several years and that a 2017 ISG report identified coating delamination and spalling that would require a larger project. Staff outlined five options: minimal roof repairs (estimated at $90,000); roof repairs plus pool-shell rehabilitation (additional $140,000, total about $230,000); shell rehabilitation plus investigating process piping (televising ~$10,000; likely repairs ~$50,000); full reconstruction (estimated upward of $2,000,000 depending on scope); and separate handling of water slides (replacement cost estimated $200,000–$500,000 or closure/removal at minimal cost).
Nut graf: The council discussed near-term costs, the pool’s capacity to remain open in the coming season, and possible funding approaches. Staff noted a $150,000 hotel-motel-tax allocation available that could be applied toward a mid-term repair package. Members expressed a consensus to pursue the repair-and-investigate approach that would extend the pool’s life and buy time to evaluate longer-term options.
Councilmembers asked about the annual cost of water loss from leaks and learned staff had seen a recent spike while preparing the pool for the season but that loss had returned closer to prior years’ rates. Metcalfe recommended televising the piping to assess hidden leaks and warned that selective roof repairs would be difficult for contractors to guarantee.
Several councilmembers said the historical significance of the pool house argued for repairing that building’s roof and masonry; members also raised the possibility of fundraising or sponsorships to fund new slides. One councilmember suggested using hotel-motel tax funds plus capital programming to cover midterm repairs and estimated that preserving the pool for another 10 years would require an annual subsidy on the order of $22,000 per year if spread across that timeframe.
The council did not adopt a formal ordinance or appropriations at the meeting. Instead, the council expressed general direction for staff to pursue the prioritized repairs (roof, shell rehabilitation, and investigation of piping) and to return with refined estimates and funding recommendations.
Ending: Staff will proceed with the investigative work (televising piping) and prepare a capital programming recommendation and funding options for a future meeting.
