Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Elections Administration topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council discusses HB1130 election changes, leans toward November elections and possible county administration

5330120 · July 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After state changes under House Bill 1130 ended April municipal elections, Brandon councilors discussed options for moving city elections to June or November, and signaled a preference for November with the county running elections where possible.

The Brandon City Council held an extended discussion about changes required by the state Legislature (House Bill 1130) that remove April municipal elections and require cities to hold elections in June (primary) or November (general) going forward. Council members reviewed three options: keep city‑run elections in the new statutory calendar, have the county run odd/even year elections (or all elections), or move City elected terms and schedules to even‑numbered years so the county would run the contests.

Staff reported preliminary cost estimates from the county of roughly $5,000–$6,000 to run an election when the county handles the administration; city-run elections with three polling locations were estimated at about $3,000–$4,000 for supplies and boards (excluding staff time). Councilors cited lower turnout and more ballot‑type permutations during primary (June) elections and expressed preference for November because of higher turnout and simpler ballots.

The council discussed logistics including absentee voting locations, ballot complexity during primaries (separate party ballots and potential school elections), and the timing of seating newly elected council members (June elections would seat new council in July; November elections would seat members in December, after budget and CIP work). One councilor said the county prefers November and several councilors said they were leaning toward November elections.

Council did not take a final vote at the meeting and staff said a decision would be needed later in the year to finalize whether the city will change cycle years or rely on county administration for specific elections. If the city elects even‑year cycles for municipal elections, the ordinance and seat terms would require amendment.