Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council amends El Camino Real focus‑area zoning to boost housing: expanded boundaries, tiered standards, and affordable‑unit incentives
Summary
Palo Alto’s City Council adopted code changes expanding the El Camino Real housing focus area, adding tiered lot‑size incentives, standardizing a 45° daylight plane, adjusting upper‑story stepbacks and directing staff to study a reduced Hansen Way special setback and other refinements. The council vote was 5–0 with two recusals.
Palo Alto — The City Council on May 27 adopted a package of zoning changes to the El Camino Real housing focus area designed to speed housing production and provide clearer development incentives for consolidated sites.
Key changes the council approved include expanding the geographic focus area, creating two tiers of development standards to encourage lot consolidation, standardizing a 45‑degree daylight plane for upper‑story massing next to single‑family neighborhoods, simplifying upper‑story stepbacks on primary frontages, and updating in‑lieu and fee exemptions tied to below‑market‑rate units. The motion passed 5–0 with two council members recusing themselves.
Why it matters
The focus area program, adopted previously as part of the housing element and targeted to transit corridors, offers greater height and floor‑area incentives in exchange for on‑site affordable units. The amendments are intended to make it more feasible to build dense housing near transit, provide a clearer set of objective standards for builders, and bring existing builder‑remedy applications into alignment with city rules.
Major provisions adopted or directed
- Boundaries expanded: The ordinance adds parcels around California Avenue and includes two builder‑remedy proposals at the southern end of El Camino. The council also directed staff to include three tier‑2 parcels (2905, 2951 and 2999 El Camino) for further consideration.
- Two‑tier incentives: Larger consolidated lots (tier 1) can access the most favorable standards (up to 4.0 FAR and a top height objective); smaller parcels have a different tier with lower incentives to encourage consolidation for efficient circulation and parking.
- Daylight plane and upper story massing: Council adopted a standard 45° daylight plane beginning at 16 feet for upper‑story massing where buildings abut R‑1 zones; the ARB/PTC had debated a steeper 30° option but the 45° standard passed.
- Stepbacks and façade rules: The ordinance simplifies the front‑facing upper‑story stepback rule (reducing the prescriptive average requirement and setting a 10‑foot minimum stepback) to maintain some relief from bulk while reducing complexity for applicants.
- Affordable unit incentives and fee exemptions: For projects using the focus‑area incentives and proposing at least 20% lower‑income units on‑site, the council approved exemptions from certain development impact fees for those units to improve financial feasibility.
- Hansen Way setback and special easement: The council directed staff to study and pursue reducing the special 50‑foot Hansen Way setback to roughly 20–30 feet (staff will refine this with the transportation office), after hearing that the 50‑foot setback, combined with a utilities easement, constrains development at one research‑park corner.
- Hotels and non‑residential uses: The council asked staff to accommodate hotel uses more flexibly than standard office limits in some focus‑area locations, and to return specific zoning language that allows hospitality FAR/height parity in appropriate locations.
Public and developer input
Developers and property owners who testified urged flexibility (height, FAR and clear objective standards) to make projects financially feasible; one applicant told the council that without fee relief for below‑market‑rate units the project would not be feasible. Neighborhood groups and some commissioners pressed for stronger daylight, stepback and transition controls to protect adjacent single‑family neighborhoods.
What happens next
Staff will return the final ordinance language for second reading incorporating the council’s direction on the Hansen Way setback, the tier‑2 parcel inclusions and context‑specific rules for below‑grade setbacks and hotels. The adopted changes will be folded into the housing‑element implementation and the city’s design guidelines.
Ending
Councilmembers said the revisions aim to strike a balance between adding housing near transit and protecting residential neighborhoods. The ordinance passed 5–0 with two recusal votes recorded on the final roll call.
