Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Dangerous Dogs Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Skagit County adopts code changes on dangerous and potentially dangerous dogs, sets thresholds for pack and livestock attacks
Summary
The Board approved amendments to County Code Title 7 to address dangerous and potentially dangerous dogs, including provisions tied to repeated attacks and packs of animals; the code imposes containment and insurance requirements when triggers are met.
Skagit County commissioners approved amendments to County Code Title 7 on July 7 that add or revise provisions addressing dangerous and potentially dangerous dogs. The changes follow a public comment period and staff review; the prosecutor’s office and animal control participated in the discussion.
County staff and the prosecutor’s office explained the intent of the changes is to address public-safety risks from aggressive dogs while allowing owners a chance to demonstrate which animal was responsible when multiple dogs are present. County staff described a threshold intended to address instances where multiple similar dogs make identification of an individual animal difficult: the code treats packs above a specified size as subject to the potentially dangerous-dog provisions when an aggressive incident occurs and the specific dog cannot be identified.
Officials described other triggers in the draft: repeated attacks on livestock or pets can also prompt enforcement measures. The code includes substantial owner responsibilities once a dog is declared dangerous or potentially dangerous, including registration, containment requirements, microchipping, posting and insurance requirements; staff cited a $250,000 liability-insurance benchmark as part of the package of requirements in serious cases.
During discussion commissioners asked about practical effects and edge cases: one commissioner asked whether the rule would automatically deem all dogs in a large pack dangerous; staff and the prosecutor clarified that owners will have an opportunity to identify the specific animal and that the threshold is intended to address situations where identification is not possible. Officials said the rule is aimed at public and livestock safety while also allowing remedies short of immediate blanket classification for every multi-dog household.
A motion to adopt the code changes was moved and seconded and passed by voice vote.
