Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Variance Expiration Zoning Permit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Petoskey ZBA discusses tightening variance expiration and permit rules; staff to draft ordinance language
Summary
The Zoning Board of Appeals reviewed two options for amending Appendix A (Article 20) to clarify when a variance and associated zoning permit expire and directed staff to draft clearer language to present to the planning commission and to review again in August.
At its July 1 meeting, the Petoskey City Zoning Board of Appeals discussed proposed changes to Appendix A (Article 20) aimed at clarifying how long variances and zoning permits remain valid and how the zoning permit and county building permit timelines should interact.
Staff presented two options: (1) require that, within one year of a variance approval, an applicant must obtain a zoning permit, obtain any required building permits and commence erection or alteration of the building that is progressing toward completion, with failure to do so causing the permit to expire and require a new variance; or (2) allow applicants to return to the ZBA to request an extension of an approved variance without reapplying for a full new variance.
Board members and staff focused on practical implementation questions: how the zoning administrator would verify that a building permit had been issued by the county, how the permit form and ordinance language must align to be enforceable, and whether the ordinance or the permit application must explicitly tie variance validity to the date the variance is granted (the board favored specifying a "drop-dead" expiration date tied to the date of variance approval). Laura, a city staff member, said the application currently states zoning permits are valid for 12 months from issuance but that the form alone is not enforceable; any change that municipalities seek to enforce must appear in the ordinance.
Board members agreed the language should be simplified and clarified (several members suggested breaking the paragraph into numbered conditions rather than one long sentence). They instructed staff to draft redrafted ordinance language using clearer items/numbering and to bring the proposed amendments to the planning commission for consideration. The board scheduled an August meeting to review the draft amendments.
No formal vote was taken; the board reached consensus to have staff prepare revised text and to return the item for formal consideration at a future open meeting.
