Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Property And Easements topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee reviews resolution to terminate cross-exit easement in Applecross subdivision

5129018 · July 1, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

New Castle County Land Use Committee heard a proposed resolution to terminate a cross-exit easement affecting Lots 23 and 24 in the Applecross Subdivision. Property owners and county staff told the committee the easement is no longer needed and the item will be scheduled for formal consideration at the full council meeting next Tuesday.

The New Castle County Land Use Committee considered a resolution to terminate a cross-exit easement affecting Lots 23 and 24 in the Applecross Subdivision at its meeting.

An attorney representing both property owners, Thomas Mamarella, told the committee the two lots have separate driveways and that the parties agreed the easement is no longer necessary. “Both property owners have agreed to the termination,” Mamarella said, adding that a sale of Lot 24 included a release of easement rights by the buyers and sellers that left the properties independent.

Councilwoman Durham said the Land Use Department had reviewed the request and concurred. “It has been through the land use department and, gotten their concurrence,” she said. Committee members reported no public objections at the time of the meeting.

The item was not finally decided; the chair said it would be placed on the full County Council agenda for formal approval next Tuesday. No formal vote on the termination occurred at the committee meeting.

Background: The resolution concerns the public record and property title by extinguishing the recorded easement that had once provided cross-access between the two parcels. Committee discussion focused on whether the applicant was present and whether any community concerns remained.