Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Government Operations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wayne County commissioners approve multiple committee reports; several abstentions and no votes recorded
Summary
The board approved a series of committee reports across economic development, public services, ways and means, health and human services, audit and other committees; a public-services item was passed for the day and several abstentions and no votes were recorded for specific items.
Get email alerts on the Government Operations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Wayne County Board of Commissioners approved multiple committee reports and received audit items during the meeting, moving a range of committee business to final disposition by the full board.
Reports approved included: the committee on economic development (report A, two items), the committee on public services (report B, 11 items, with the administration asking to "pass for the day" on item 3), the committee on ways and means (report C, 13 items), the committee on health and human services (report D, nine items), the audit committee (report E, two items received as file), the committee on public safety, judiciary and homeland security (report F, one item), and the committee on government operations (report G, seven items). Each report was moved and then voted on by the full board; the chair repeatedly announced "motion carries" in the transcript for these en-bloc approvals.
The meeting record shows several recorded abstentions and no votes on particular items. Commissioner Garza was noted as the maker of motion on item 6 of the public services report and was recorded as abstaining on item 11. Commissioner Kanesick was recorded as an abstention on item 9 of the health and human services report. Commissioner Anderson was recorded as voting no on items 3 and 4 in the government operations report; Commissioner Anderson also earlier asked for additional information about a ways and means item before voting to move the report forward with the contingency that questions be answered.
Several committee discussions produced clarifying information during debate. In ways and means, Commissioner Kenlock asked that item 8 proceed only after questions raised in committee were answered; Melissa Fernandez, identified in the transcript as "director of juvenile news services," told the board that responses had been submitted to finance and explained that the item involved a joint membership split between agencies. Transcript remarks indicated some confusion about dollar amounts discussed (one commissioner said it "looks like it's more like 13,000 than 8,000" while another said a particular item was for $4,000). The deputy corporation counsel, identified in the record as Suhamu, told the board that two items in government operations were related to the same lawsuit and that two different law firms would represent different parties (the county and the sheriff, respectively); one commissioner stated she would vote no on those items.
Where specific items were discussed by name, board members either asked for clarifications or recorded their votes and abstentions; most consent items were approved en bloc and recorded as carried. The transcript does not include item-level roll-call tallies for every item in the en-bloc votes; the clerk's official minutes should be consulted for the formal roll-call counts.
Ending: The board continued through agenda items and then proceeded to memorials, public comment, and remarks by members.

