Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Procedures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Baltimore County charging committee approves minutes, votes to enter closed session to review investigatory files
Summary
The Baltimore County Administrative Charging Committee on June 27, 2025, approved the June 6 meeting minutes and unanimously voted to enter a closed session to review investigative files, citing a county code section and a COMAR regulation. The committee set its next meeting for Aug. 1, 2025.
Get email alerts on the Meeting Procedures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Baltimore County Administrative Charging Committee on June 27, 2025, approved the minutes of its June 6 meeting and unanimously voted to move into closed session to review investigatory files, committee members said.
Committee member Christopher Sui, who opened the meeting, said the session would begin at 2 p.m. and later asked for a vote, saying, “All in favor, please say aye.” After the roll call approval of the June 6 minutes, a member moved that the committee “go into closed session to review investigative files in compliance with section 3-3-2806 of the Baltimore County Code and COMAR 12.04.09.05(d)(1),” and another member seconded the motion. The committee recorded the vote as unanimous.
The motion cited a specific Baltimore County code section and a Maryland regulation in the Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) as the legal basis for the closed-session review of investigatory files. The committee returned to open session and set its next meeting for Aug. 1, 2025, at 12 p.m. in Room 118 of the Baltimore County Historic Courthouse and by Webex. A motion to adjourn was made, seconded and approved.
The meeting record shows no other substantive agenda discussion in open session; the committee conducted roll call, approved minutes, handled the closed-session motion and adjourned. The closed session was described only as a review of investigative files; no additional details about those files were stated in the public portion of the transcript.

