Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Votes Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Jenks council and authority approve consent agendas, sanitary sewer easement and chamber addendum
Summary
The Jenks City Council and Jenks Public Works Authority approved their consent agendas. The council approved a sanitary sewer easement for an In The Raw development site; the authority approved an addendum to the Chamber of Commerce professional services agreement that adds KPI reporting and budget detail.
The Jenks City Council and the Jenks Public Works Authority took several routine approvals and two action items at the meeting:
• City Council consent agenda — Approved. The council voted to approve the consent agenda without pulling items (Brown: Yes; Short: Yes; Emmons: Yes; Murray: Yes; Mayor Corey Box: Yes).
• Sanitary sewer easement (related to In The Raw development) — Approved. Staff said the 10-acre parcel immediately east of the Tulsa Premium Outlets must connect to a sanitary sewer lift station installed by Simon Property Group southwest of the mall. The authority and economic development body previously approved incentives to connect the parcel. The council approved the sanitary sewer easement dedication needed to place the utility. Vote: Brown: Yes; Short: Yes; Emmons: Yes; Murray: Yes; Mayor Corey Box: Yes.
• Jenks Public Works Authority consent agenda — Approved. Vote: Brown: Yes; Short: Yes; Evans: Yes; Murray: Yes; Chair Corey Box: Yes.
• Addendum to Chamber of Commerce professional services agreement (JPWA item 3) — Approved. The addendum incorporates a more detailed budget and commits the Chamber to provide quarterly KPI reports and budget updates; the Chamber representative described metrics for event attendance, sponsorships, business participation, marketing and year-over-year comparisons. Vote: Brown: Yes; Short: Yes; Evans: Yes; Murray: Yes; Chair Corey Box: Yes.
Votes and outcomes were recorded during the meeting; no roll-call recorded any dissents for these items. Details in the meeting packet (agenda pages referenced by staff) provide additional line-item information.
Ending: Staff indicated items pulled from consent would be handled separately at future meetings; no defeated motions were reported.
