Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Recreational Vehicles Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee backs city attorney report on recreational-vehicle rules and fines; asks for draft ordinance with higher penalties
Summary
The city committee heard from the city attorney on a proposed ordinance updating municipal code definitions for recreational vehicles and escalating penalties; the committee approved the report with an amendment directing the city attorney to draft ordinance language and return with a draft by the next meeting cycle.
The city committee heard a presentation from the city attorney on a proposed ordinance to update the municipal code’s definitions of recreational vehicles and to raise fines and penalties for prohibited uses. The committee approved the city attorney’s report with an amendment asking the city attorney to draft an ordinance that would allow increased penalties and return a draft ordinance to the committee at a later meeting.
City Attorney Michael (recorded in the meeting as the city attorney) told the committee that fines in the draft had not been updated in roughly 25 years and discussed a graduated penalty scale included in the staff presentation. Michael said the draft sets the maximum penalty at $1,000 and noted the office could seek to prosecute persistent violations under criminal or civil authorities as appropriate to enforcement needs.
Staff described the proposed changes as enabling the city to regulate vehicle operators and owners and to escalate penalties for repeat violations. The draft’s definition section uses state statutory definitions for ‘‘recreational vehicle’’ and related terms; committee members were told the city must rely on state law language for those definitions and cannot create separate local definitions.
During discussion, one committee member expressed support for increasing penalties to deter repeat offenders and to provide prosecutors discretion to escalate enforcement when warranted. The committee voted to approve the city attorney’s report with the requested additional language on penalty amounts and to direct the city attorney to return with a draft ordinance for further consideration.
On the record, the committee’s roll call showed Concejal Hot (yes) and Concejal Park (yes); Concejal De was recorded as absent. The motion asked staff to return with a draft ordinance and to include a revised fee structure; the committee set a target date for returning draft ordinance materials in the committee packet for a later meeting date.
The committee did not adopt the ordinance at this meeting; it approved the report and asked staff to prepare a draft ordinance with revised penalties and implementation information for the next committee meeting.
