Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cathedral City council supports broader Historic Preservation Committee work plan but affirms advisory role
Summary
City staff asked for direction on the Historic Preservation Committee; councilors agreed the committee may pursue outreach—oral histories, walking tours and centennial activities—while keeping its advisory-only authority intact.
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff asked the Cathedral City Council for direction on the intended scope of the Historic Preservation Committee, and council members signaled support for allowing the committee to pursue a broader work plan that includes outreach, oral histories and commemorative activities while keeping the committee’s current advisory authority intact.
Community and Economic Development Director Andy Firestein reviewed the committee's history. The council established the HPC by ordinance (identified in staff remarks as ordinance number "8 21" in 2019), and since 2022 the committee has developed application forms and processed the city's only historic designation to date—the Agnes Pelton home and studio, adopted by council after the HPC recommended the designation in October 2023. Firestein said the committee has five members and that the group adopted an annual work plan in May 2025 after intermittent meetings owing to quorum challenges.
Firestein told council the committee had two camps: one that preferred the body remain narrowly focused on reviewing designation and certificate-of-appropriateness applications, and another that wanted to expand into education and commemoration. He said the municipal code (Chapter 8) and the ordinance include language encouraging public knowledge and appreciation of the city's history. Firestein said staff sees "strong support" for allowing the broader work-plan activities, but clarified council action would be needed for any change that would give the committee permitting or approval authority.
Council members discussed scope and limits. Some expressed skepticism about a broad preservation effort given the city's relative youth and demolition of older buildings, noting that property owners must opt in for designation. Others supported documenting and celebrating local history through plaques, walking tours, oral histories and public events such as the upcoming centennial of the first subdivision. Council and staff repeatedly emphasized that creating a historic district or imposing restrictions would require separate council action and that the current code does not automatically authorize involuntary districts.
Public comment included a written submission provided for the record (identified as a comment from "Irinox") and an in-person speaker who advised forming an independent historical society to handle voluntary outreach, noting Brown Act constraints on meetings can hinder volunteer committees' outside work.
Firestein and other staff said the HPC’s authority remains advisory: it makes recommendations to council and planning staff; it does not approve or deny historic designations on its own. Council members directed staff to allow the HPC to proceed with its adopted work plan and outreach activities, with staff oversight to ensure the committee does not exceed its advisory role. No formal ordinance change or vote was taken during the study session.

