Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
State attorneys general tell Congress they are fighting administration'lawlessness' in court
Summary
Eight state attorneys general told a joint Senate-House spotlight forum that they have filed dozens of lawsuits and won multiple injunctions to block what they described as unconstitutional executive actions on immigration, federal funding and other policy areas.
Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., opened a joint Senate-House "spotlight" hearing on June 14, 2025, by saying state attorneys general are serving as a frontline defense against what they described as an administration that is exceeding constitutional limits.
"Our country is currently facing several catastrophic challenges that the Trump administration is ignoring or exacerbating," Durbin said as he introduced the four principal witnesses. "In this disturbing environment, many Americans have no greater ally than their state's attorneys general."
The four primary witnessesIllinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul, Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkintestified that their offices have filed dozens of lawsuits in the past months to block or unwind executive actions they say exceed presidential authority and harm residents.
"Today I want to speak clearly and factually about three specific areas where the Trump administration's actions have had a deeply harmful impact," Raoul said, listing tariffs, education-funding cuts and rollbacks of diversity, equity and inclusion programs.
Why it matters: The attorneys general portrayed their litigation as efforts to preserve separation of powers, protect federally appropriated funding and defend civil liberties. They told lawmakers their suits are not partisan fights but legal steps to enforce statutes, constitutional limits and court precedent.
Most important facts
- Litigation and injunctions: Attorneys general said states have filed hundreds of suits against the administration, winning multiple preliminary injunctions and temporary restraining orders. Raoul and other witnesses cited litigation that blocked planned cuts to National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding, a court order forcing the administration to…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

