Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Intergenerational Property Transfer topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bill would extend deadline to record intergenerational transfers after disasters to protect family-held homes

5065999 · June 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Sen. (presenter) introduced SB 293 to extend the filing deadline from six months to three years for certain property-transfer paperwork after qualifying disasters; committee referred the bill to the suspense file after supportive testimony from assessors and community groups.

Sen. (presenter identified in the hearing) presented SB 293, described as the Generational Homeownership Protection Act, to allow homeowners affected by a declared emergency more time to update property-transfer records necessary to preserve exclusions from reassessment.

The author said many family properties passed down without recorded title transfers risk losing preferred property-tax treatment after a disaster because the current law requires reassessment forms to be submitted within six months of an owner's passing or transfer date. “Without recorded property transfers, homeowners are ineligible to qualify for these property tax exemptions under current law,” the author said, citing examples from the Eaton Fire and Altadena communities.

SB 293 would extend the six-month filing deadline to three years for disaster-impacted homeowners, and would prevent retroactive reassessment if the property meets specified conditions: the property was damaged or destroyed in a qualifying declared emergency; the owner already has a clear title; and the property otherwise meets criteria for an intergenerational transfer under applicable statutes. Rob Grossglauser spoke for the California Assessors Association; Elise Forth of the California Community Foundation also testified in support.

Committee members expressed support and asked the author to work with the committee on clarifying technical provisions; the chair referred the bill to the committee suspense file. No vote to advance the bill was recorded at this hearing.