Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Intergovernmental Agreement Hr Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cochise County supervisors approve intergovernmental agreement with Superior Court for human resources services
Summary
At a June 17 special meeting, the Cochise County Board of Supervisors approved an intergovernmental agreement with the Cochise County Superior Court to provide human resources services after discussing the matter in executive session under Arizona statute.
Get email alerts on the Intergovernmental Agreement Hr Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cochise County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday, June 17, 2025, approved an intergovernmental agreement between the Cochise County Superior Court and Cochise County to provide human resources services.
The board convened a special meeting at 1 p.m. and moved into executive session under Arizona Revised Statutes cited on the record (see below) to discuss the agreement. After returning to open session, Supervisor Gomez moved to approve the agreement, saying, “I move to approve the intergovernmental agreement between the Cochise County Superior Court and Cochise County For Human Resources Services.” The motion was seconded; members voiced “aye,” the chair recorded an aye, and the motion passed.
The board opened by noting the meeting was a special session and referenced Arizona statutes that limit public disclosure of executive-session minutes. During the executive-session portion the public record shows Supervisor Tom Crosby and Rachel Gray from the clerk’s office were moved into the executive session; attendees listed by the board included Jennifer Graham from Human Resources, Bert Whitehead from the County Attorney’s Office, Nelson Flores from Court Administration, Andrew Casey, and Sharon Nolan.
The board did not provide further details in the public record about the agreement’s terms (such as duration, financials, or specific scope of services) during the open portion of the meeting. The motion and the subsequent vote were recorded as passed by voice; no roll-call tally with individual yes/no/abstain labels was placed in the public portion of the transcript.
The meeting concluded with the chair asking Ms. Gilman to announce the next meeting: Thursday, June 19 at 10 a.m. in the Executive Conference Room, when the board will discuss and may provide direction regarding voting machine status and legal compliance.
Because substantive discussion of the agreement occurred in executive session, the public transcript contains limited detail about the contract’s provisions or implementation steps.

