Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Members split on advisory-board composition; some favor residents from areas where VHRs are permitted
Summary
Board discussed whether to retain a designated East Fork/Tahoe-area seat or change the advisory board composition; members disagreed on the best balance of permit-holders and non-permit-holders and asked staff to forward options to the BOCC.
The advisory board reviewed proposed language about its own composition and whether to preserve a designated East Fork (Tahoe-area) seat.
Board members described competing rationales. Some members said a seat for residents of the Tahoe basin (previously described in packet material as an East Fork seat) brings boots-on-the-ground experience from…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
