Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Police Accountability Board topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council confirms 21 appointments to new Community Board for Police Accountability
Summary
Portland City Council voted to confirm 21 members and six alternates to the Community Board for Police Accountability (CBPA), advancing implementation of the voter-approved oversight system. Council discussed district balance, eligibility checks and staggered terms before the 11–1 confirmation vote.
The Portland City Council voted to confirm 21 members and six alternates to the newly created Community Board for Police Accountability on June 18, 2025, advancing an oversight body established by voters in the city charter.
Council approved the slate after a public review of nominees and a discussion about district representation, background checks and term lengths. Council President (name not specified in transcript) presented the final list and invited nominees present at the meeting to introduce themselves. Nominees described a mix of community, legal and lived-experience backgrounds and emphasized commitments to fairness, transparency and community-led oversight.
The nominations followed a months-long recruitment and screening process. Staff and council said the next steps include a criminal background check tied to CJIS access, an eligibility check to confirm nominees are not current or former law enforcement and a review for demonstrated bias either for or against police, any of which could disqualify an appointee. Staff said the deputy city administrator may grant waivers for certain criminal histories in accordance with code.
Council members debated geographic balance after several speakers and some councilors noted that a disproportionate share of nominees came from District 2. Council staff said the applicant pool itself skewed heavily to that district; terms were intentionally randomized within districts so reappointments and future recruitment would not leave any district unrepresented. Councilors also asked that the appointed members and alternates attend an early briefing with the Community and Public Safety Committee and meet a July schedule to align with a pending court settlement check-in.
After discussion, council moved to accept the report confirming the appointments; the confirmations were recorded as 11 yes, 1 no. Council and staff said a final step before service will be background and eligibility checks and a separate process to assign specific term lengths and staggered start dates.
The appointments mark a major step toward creating the community-led oversight system voters approved in Ballot Measure 26-217 (referred to in council materials). Councilors and public advocates emphasized the board’s intended role to restore trust through impartial review and to align practice with the priorities set by the volunteer Police Accountability Commission that drafted the implementing code.
The city will notify appointees of next steps, including formal onboarding, background checks and scheduling the board’s first meetings.
