Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Florence Park topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Florence Park neighborhood character overlay reviewed; planners describe limits on height, roof pitch and driveways
Summary
Committee reviewed a proposed Florence Park character overlay that would limit building height to 30 feet/2 stories, require a 12:12 roof pitch in many cases, cap driveway width at 12 feet and allow accessory dwelling units by right; planning commission recommended approval 8–2.
The Urban Economic Development Committee considered a proposed neighborhood character overlay for Florence Park that would add specific design and massing rules for infill construction, planners said.
Susan Nunn of the Planning Office and planner Felicity Good presented the draft, which staff described as a tool to promote compatibility of new infill housing with Florence Park’s existing Tudor-revival and bungalow architecture. Nunn said the overlay was requested by the neighborhood and council and followed multiple neighborhood meetings and open houses.
Key provisions presented include a maximum building height of 30 feet (two stories), a maximum driveway width of 12 feet, a maximum building width of about 40 feet, an 18-foot setback requirement for wall‑touching garages (they must be at least 18 feet behind the front building façade), and a requirement that primary residential entrances access the structure via a front porch or stoop. The draft also would allow accessory dwelling units (ADUs) by right and would require steeper roof pitches in some areas (illustrated as a 12:12 pitch) to preserve the neighborhood’s character.
Staff said the Planning Commission (TMABC) voted 8–2 to recommend approval; the two dissenting commissioners said additional standards might complicate housing production. Nunn noted that Renaissance neighborhood has an existing character overlay and that the Florence Park draft borrows some features while adjusting others to local preferences.
Committee members discussed trade-offs between preserving neighborhood character and encouraging housing supply. One councilor said the overlay ‘‘creates a certain mechanism to have infill’’ in an area unlikely to see wholesale teardown and replacement, while another cautioned against proliferating overlays across the city and raising complexity for builders.
Ending: Staff said they would track ADU permit activity to see whether overlays accelerate ADU construction; no final committee action was recorded in the transcript.
