Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Permitting Timelines topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate panel advances bill to impose permitting timelines across state agencies
Summary
The Senate Housing Committee voted to pass AB 301 as amended to the Appropriations Committee after testimony that the bill would create consistent permitting timelines across state agencies to speed housing and fire-recovery projects.
Get email alerts on the Permitting Timelines topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At a California State Senate Housing Committee hearing, members advanced AB 301, a measure by Assemblymember Shivo that would establish uniform timelines and responsiveness standards for state permitting agencies involved in housing and reconstruction projects.
Supporters said the bill is intended to create parity between state and local permitting processes and to speed recovery and rebuilding after recent wildfires. "By accelerating the permitting process, we can help the hardest hit communities recover faster, rebuild homes, and stimulate local economies," Assemblymember Shivo said in presenting the proposal.
The bill, described by witnesses as broadly applicable to construction projects as well as fire recovery work, would require state departments involved in governmental reviews or approvals associated with housing development projects to adhere to specified timelines (for example, responding within 30 or 60 days depending on project size). "This is really about parity and consistency," Corey Smith, executive director of the Housing Action Coalition, told the committee.
Several senators pressed for clearer definitions of which state entities would be covered. Senator Cabaldon and others asked whether the bill as drafted could be read to reach agencies that do not issue post-entitlement permits; Senator Sciarra said the measure should be explicit to avoid agencies opting out and to ensure the law targets the post-entitlement approvals that often slow projects. The author acknowledged the committee could refine the language and agreed to take feedback back for further negotiations.
After discussion and suggested clarifying amendments, the committee voted to move AB 301 as amended to the Appropriations Committee. The committee roll call and subsequent clerk report showed the bill reported out (recorded in the transcript as "8 0. That bill is out").
Supporters at the hearing included representatives from housing and development groups and local governments, among them the Housing Action Coalition, Bay Area Council, California YIMBY and several local housing authorities and nonprofits.
The committee indicated additional amendments were possible as the bill proceeds to Appropriations, particularly to narrow or clarify which state agencies are covered and to codify that the statute targets post-entitlement permitting reviews rather than every state action that touches housing projects.
