Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Family Definition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission recommends change to zoning 'family' definition to address overcrowding concerns
Summary
Planning staff proposed and the commission recommended an amendment to Article 2 of the city zoning ordinance to replace dual definitions of "family" with a single standard aimed at reducing ambiguity and bringing more households into conformance with zoning rules.
The Muskegon City Planning Commission on May 15 recommended that the City Commission approve an amendment to Article 2 of the city zoning ordinance to revise the definition of “family.” The change was staff‑initiated and passed after discussion and a public hearing with no in‑person commenters.
Staff explained the current ordinance contains two competing definitions: a blood/marriage/adoption‑based definition (plus two others), and a “functional family” definition that treats unrelated adults living and sharing responsibilities as a family but applies a density metric (one person per 225 square feet). Staff said that formula can allow large numbers of adults in large houses (an example calculation indicated a 4,000‑square‑foot house could permit as many as 17 occupants under the functional definition).
Staff said the amendment would replace the two definitions with a single standard and would raise the typical allowable number of unrelated adults to levels the department believes are reasonable for neighborhood infrastructure — staff mentioned five unrelated individuals as an example that would bring more households into zoning conformance while protecting housing stock from overcrowding.
Commissioners questioned enforcement. One commissioner called enforcement “difficult” and observed the issue does not come up frequently; staff agreed, saying the city usually learns about potential nonconformance only when someone raises a complaint or requests clarification. A commissioner also said some states (staff cited Colorado as an example encountered at a national planning conference) have taken the approach of eliminating a formal definition of “family,” but staff said local regulation still appears necessary to address boarding houses, single‑room occupancy and transitional housing.
A motion recommending the amendment to the City Commission passed on a roll‑call vote with all present commissioners voting yes.
The Planning Commission’s recommendation will be forwarded to the City Commission for final action; no effective date or implementation details were specified at the Planning Commission meeting.
