Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wage Payment And Termination Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill would clarify and extend “wages and compensation” owed on termination; employers contest increased penalty
Summary
SB198 would define “compensation” (bonuses, fringe, profit sharing, matching contributions) as amounts due when normally scheduled after termination and increase late‑payment penalties to time‑and‑one‑half for unpaid days; labor groups supported the clarification while resort and business groups opposed the penalty increase.
Senator Skip Daly told the Assembly Commerce and Labor Committee Senate Bill 198 revises Nevada’s wage‑payment rules to clarify that “compensation” — including bonuses, profit‑sharing agreements, fringe benefits and employer contributions to retirement plans — is treated alongside wages when an employee is terminated.
Daly said current law requires wages and compensation earned and unpaid at termination to be due immediately but acknowledged that in practice employers typically pay certain benefits on their regular schedule. SB198 would define compensation explicitly and require unpaid compensation to be paid on the same day and in the same manner it would ordinarily be paid; the bill also revises the enforcement penalty structure for late payments.
Why it matters: sponsor supporters said the bill gives employers clear notice and ensures employees receive benefits and deferred compensation they earned; opponents argued the proposed penalty — time‑and‑one‑half for each day or portion of an eight‑hour day up to 30 days — is excessive and could harm small businesses.
Key provisions and testimony
Daly said the bill adds a definition of “compensation” to NRS 608.020 and parallels existing language so compensation not due immediately at termination would instead be paid on the employee’s next regular pay date (for example, monthly profit‑sharing payments). The bill keeps the three‑day statutory grace period but increases the penalty assessed for missed payments to time‑and‑one‑half for up to 30 days; Daly said he considered shortening the grace period to one day but retained three days in negotiations.
The Nevada State AFL‑CIO testified in support. Brett Harris, Nevada Labor Commissioner, testified in neutral and said the office interprets deferred compensation to be due at its regularly scheduled time and that the bill’s language would allow for proration in some plans. Business groups — the Nevada Resort Association, Vegas Chamber, Henderson Chamber and Nevada Restaurant Association — opposed section 3(c), the overtime‑style penalty, arguing existing statutory remedies and back‑pay requirements are sufficient.
Labor‑management and collective bargaining
Daly told the committee the bill does not override collective bargaining agreements; if a collective bargaining agreement contains specific terms for payment timing, those terms continue to govern. Assembly member Yurek asked whether annual profit‑sharing computations would create administrative burdens; Daly and the labor commissioner said payouts would be due when the plan regularly pays them and that the bill was intended to parallel existing pay‑period practice.
Where it stands
No vote was taken. Stakeholders signaled willingness to continue negotiating penalty language; the sponsor said he had tried to balance employer concerns while ensuring employees receive owed compensation and benefits.
