Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident accuses city officials of misconduct and cites FPPC sanctions during public comment
Summary
During the public comment period of the Cathedral City study session, resident Alan Carvalho alleged misleading statements by a city official about alley paving and vacation rental outreach, and the clerk read three written comments referencing California Fair Political Practices Commission case number 202100156.
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During the public comment period of the Cathedral City study session, resident Alan Carvalho delivered a sustained set of allegations about city conduct and an identified city official, and the city clerk read three written comments referencing a California Fair Political Practices Commission matter.
Carvalho told the council he was "concerned and disappointed with the state of this city," identified a city official in the record with the phonetic references "mister Anesto" and "mister Ernesto," and accused that official of statements to voters about paving an alley that Carvalho said were false. He alleged the alley paving cost "$124,000," said the official sold a restaurant after previously saying he would not, and questioned whether taxpayer funds would cover pending lawsuits. Carvalho also alleged the city sent "one‑sided" mailers supporting a vacation‑rental ban and said the city received fines from the Fair Political Practices Commission.
The city clerk read three written public comments into the record referencing the California Fair Political Practices Commission case number 202100156 from Michael Hayes, David Koslow and David Trapani; the clerk's statement did not provide additional details about the contents of those comments other than that they addressed the FPPC matter.
Carvalho also criticized the city's enforcement approach to marijuana odor regulations and called for greater accountability from elected officials.
The remarks were delivered during public comment; the council did not take action on the allegations during the study session. The statements and the written comments were entered into the meeting record as public comment, and the clerk confirmed receipt of multiple written comments referencing FPPC case number 202100156.

